Lamtec Corp. v. Department of Revenue
Court of Appeals of Washington
1Opinion of the CourtBridgewater, J.
¶1 Lamtec, a New Jersey corporation, appeals from a summary judgment in favor of the Washington State Department of Revenue (Department) and its imposition of business and occupation (B&O) taxes. We hold that Lamtec’s Washington customers did not receive the products in New Jersey even though the products were shipped free on board (F.O.B.)1 Flanders, New Jersey, because the common carriers had no authority to accept, reject, or inspect on behalf of the Washington customers. We also hold that Lamtec’s activities in Washington establish a nexus for B&O tax purposes, even though they do not…
2Cases cited26 opinions
- Complete Auto Transit, Inc. v. BradySupreme Court of the United States · 1977
- Quill Corp. v. North Dakota Ex Rel. HeitkampSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
- Western Live Stock v. Bureau of RevenueSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
- National Bellas Hess, Inc. v. Department of RevenueSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- McGoldrick v. Berwind-White Coal Mining Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1940
21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Lamtec Corp. v. Department of RevenueWashington Supreme Court · 2011
- In re Washington Mutual, Inc.United States Bankruptcy Court, D. Delaware · 2012
- Lamtec Corp. v. Department of RevenueWashington Supreme Court · 2011
- Lamtec Corp. v. Department of RevenueWashington Supreme Court · 2011