Legal Opinion

Barber v. Williams

Supreme Court of Kansas

Decided January 20, 1989No. 62,207PublishedCited by 20 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Miller, C.J.:

The plaintiff, Dorothy Barber, brought this action for damages against Sylvia and Laura Williams. Plaintiff later amended her petition, naming the City of Topeka as an additional defendant. Judgment has been entered for plaintiff and against Sylvia and Laura Williams. That judgment is final, and neither Sylvia nor Laura are parties to this appeal. Plaintiff claims that her damages were caused by the City’s negligence in licensing a fortunetelling business operated by the Williamses. The trial court entered summary judgment on plaintiff s…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Jackson v. City of Kansas CitySupreme Court of Kansas · 1984
  2. Schmeck v. City of ShawneeSupreme Court of Kansas · 1982
  3. Fudge v. City of Kansas CitySupreme Court of Kansas · 1986
  4. Cansler v. StateSupreme Court of Kansas · 1984
  5. Hunt v. DresieSupreme Court of Kansas · 1987

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by20 opinions

  1. Lindenman v. UmscheidSupreme Court of Kansas · 1994
  2. McGee by and Through McGee v. ChalfantSupreme Court of Kansas · 1991
  3. State Ex Rel. Mays v. RidenhourSupreme Court of Kansas · 1991
  4. Miller v. Foulston, Siefkin, Powers & EberhardtSupreme Court of Kansas · 1990
  5. Jackson Ex Rel. Essien v. Unified School District 259Supreme Court of Kansas · 2000

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API