Bornstein v. Clearview Properties, Inc.
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
1Opinion of the Court
*1034A plaintiff seeking to restore a case to the trial calendar more than one year after it has been marked “off,” and after it has been dismissed pursuant to CPLR 3404, must demonstrate a meritorious cause of action, a reasonable excuse for the delay in prosecuting the action, a lack of intent to abandon the action, and a lack of prejudice to the defendants (see M. Parisi & Son Constr. Co., Inc. v Long Is. Obs/Gyn, P.C., 39 AD3d 819, 820 [2007]; Krichmar v Queens Med. Imaging, P.C., 26 AD3d 417, 419 [2006]; Basetti v Nour, 287 AD2d 126, 131 [2001]). The plaintiff is required to satisfy all four…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Basetti v. NourAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2001
- Knight v. City of New YorkAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1993
- Krichmar v. Queens Medical ImagingAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2006
- Kalyuskin v. RudiselAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2003
- Cruz v. Volkswagen of America Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2000
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- Mooney v. City of New YorkAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2010
- Leinas v. Long Island Jewish Medical CenterAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2010
- Sang Seok Na v. Greyhound Lines, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2011
- Montalvo v. Mumpus Restorations, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2013
- Vaream v. CorinesAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2010
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.