Legal Opinion

Woitte v. United States

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided May 9, 1927No. 4895PublishedCited by 18 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

RUDKIN, Circuit Judge.

This is a writ of error to review a judgment of conviction under an indictment containing eleven counts.

The first count charged that the plaintiffs in error and others, at a time and place to the grand jurors unknown, conspired to violate the Tariff Act of 1922 (42 Stat. 858), by importing and bringing into the United States and into the state and district of Oregon, large quantities of whisky, gin, and other intoxicating liquors fit for beverage purposes, all of which merchandise was and would be dutiable, without declaring said merchandise to any customs officers of…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Hyde v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1912
  2. Ford v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1926
  3. Brown v. ElliottSupreme Court of the United States · 1912
  4. Rogers v. RitterSupreme Court of the United States · 1871

3Cited by18 opinions

  1. George Herman v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1961
  2. Charles E. Toliver v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1955
  3. State v. La FeraSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1961
  4. Parmagini v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1930
  5. Rubio v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1927

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API