Legal Opinion

John Moss v. United States

Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit

Decided February 18, 1959No. 17462_1PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Per curiam

Approximately six months after the sentence on his plea of guilty, appellant sought a correction of it under F.R.Cr.P. 35, 18 U.S.C.A. As Rule 35 contemplates the correction of a sentence of a court having jurisdiction, Fooshee v. United States, 5 Cir., 1953, 203 F.2d 247, the Court properly considered the papers as an application under 28 U.S.C.A. § 2255 since it was urged that the sentence was void, not merely imperfect.

Moss was a confederate of Meyers, whose appeal, Meyers v. United States, 5 Cir., 1958, 260 F.2d 956, grew out of the very swindle involved here. That decision, and Londos v.…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Eugene Fisher Londos and Adrian Lawrence Dudley v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1957
  2. Thomas Nelson Arthur v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1956
  3. Fooshee v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1953
  4. James Allen McCreary v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1957
  5. Louis Vernon Cawley v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1958

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Petition of BrockmuellerSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1985
  2. Irving Gilinsky, Also Known as Samuel Benjamin Feldman v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1964
  3. Nance v. StateNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1969
  4. Richard Dean Schmidt v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1961
  5. Aubrey Aeby v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1959

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API