Legal Opinion
United States v. Gerald Stanley Sherman and Richard Henry Holland
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided September 29, 1970No. 24731PublishedCited by 34 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
TRASK, Circuit Judge:
Appellants were convicted by a jury of a violation of 21 U.S.C. § 176a. (Illegal concealment and transportation of marihuana). On appeal they challenge the failure to grant a motion for the suppression of evidence. They also raise a number of constitutional claims. We affirm.
MOTION TO SUPPRESS
A motion to suppress evidence was filed and a hearing on the motion was held pursuant to Rule 41(e) on November 12, 1968. The evidence taken at the hearing stated most favorably to the position of the government, Cotton v. United States, 371 F.2d 385, 388 (9th Cir. 1967), was…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Carroll v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1925
- Chimel v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
- Brinegar v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1949
- Beck v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
- Chambers v. MaroneySupreme Court of the United States · 1970
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by34 opinions
- United States v. Kelley Davis A/K/A Tee, in No. 71-1778, and Inez Davis. Appeal of Inez Davis, in No. 71-1779Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1972
- United States v. Michael O'LOOneyCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1976
- United States v. Edward Martin RothmanCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1974
- United States v. Odell MarshallCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1976
- State v. WileyArizona Supreme Court · 1985
29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.