Legal Opinion

Walker v. Buckmaster

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided July 17, 1923No. 12346PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtKennamer, J.

On December 7, 1920, defendant in error, plaintiff below, secured a decree in the district court of Haskell county quieting title to real estate situated therein, and on the same day motion for a new trial in the case was overruled and an extension of 90 days granted defendant, plaintiff in error here, in which, to prepare and serve case-made. Within the time allowed an order was entered by the trial judge granting an additional extension oi 30 days in which to serve case-made, plaintiff to have 10 days after the service of case-made to suggest amendments thereto, same to be settled, signed,…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Continental Casualty Co. v. OwenSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1913
  2. Ranney-Davis Mercantile Co. v. MorrisSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1923
  3. Wyant v. WheelerSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1913

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Mid-Continent Life Ins. Co. v. HouseSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1932
  2. Morris v. West Publishing Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1926
  3. Carr v. St. Louis-San Francisco Ry. Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1926
  4. Correll v. ShepherdSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1924
  5. Duncan Life & Accident Ass'n v. RossSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1935

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API