Legal Opinion

State ex rel. Wilson v. Industrial Commission

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided November 12, 1997No. 95-962PublishedCited by 37 opinions

1Per curiam

Claimant contests the validity of the commission’s order and asserts a right to permanent total disability compensation pursuant to State ex rel. Gay v. Mihm (1994), 68 Ohio St.3d 315, 626 N.E.2d 666. Upon review, we reject claimant’s challenge and affirm the judgment of the court of appeals.

The commission confines itself to Dr. Reynolds’s report with respect to claimant’s allowed conditions. Dr. Reynolds assessed a low, twenty percent permanent partial impairment and found claimant capable of sedentary and light work. There is thus “some evidence” of a medical ability by claimant to perform…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. State ex rel. Gay v. MihmOhio Supreme Court · 1994
  2. State Ex Rel. Speelman v. Industrial CommissionOhio Court of Appeals · 1992

3Cited by37 opinions

  1. State ex rel. Cunningham v. Industrial CommissionOhio Supreme Court · 2001
  2. State Ex Rel. Nissin Brake Ohio, Inc. v. Industrial CommissionOhio Supreme Court · 2010
  3. State ex rel. Barnett v. Indus. Comm.Ohio Court of Appeals · 2015
  4. State ex rel. Bonnlander v. HamonOhio Court of Appeals · 2015
  5. State ex rel. Gemind v. Indus. Comm.Ohio Supreme Court · 1998

32 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API