United States v. Burden
United States Court of Military Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
2Per curiam
At the time of appellant’s induction into the armed forces, failure to pass the Armed Forces Qualifications Test coupled with an inability to read and write in the English language was a nonwaiva-ble bar to induction.1 The uncontested evidence of record indicates that appellant advised an induction official of his reading and writing disability. The official, in turn, directed appellant "to sign the test, and the dude would take care of it.” For substantially the same reasons we enuniciated in United States v Russo, 23 USCMA —, 50 CMR — (Aug. 1, 1975), appellant’s…
3Cited by17 opinions
- United States v. HutchinsUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1978
- United States v. ValadezUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1978
- United States v. LittleUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1976
- United States v. StoneUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1979
- United States v. RuggieroU.S. Navy-Marine Corps Court of Military Review · 1977
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.