Legal Opinion

State ex rel. Juvenile Department v. L. V.

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided April 9, 2008No. 2006807581; 103073 A136556Published

1Opinion of the CourtRosenblum, J.

In this dependency case, father appeals a judgment entered after a permanency hearing. The juvenile court found that the Department of Human Services (DHS) had made reasonable efforts to make it possible for father to care for his two-year-old daughter, A, but it concluded that father had not yet made sufficient progress and declined to order placement with father or to order a family-decision meeting to implement transition of A to father’s care. Father assigns error to the court’s failure to so order and to its designation of a concurrent plan of guardianship. We review the record de novo,…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Barcik v. KubiaczykOregon Supreme Court · 1995
  2. State Ex Rel. Juvenile Department v. NagleCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1978
  3. State Ex Rel. Department of Human Services v. RardinOregon Supreme Court · 2006
  4. State Ex Rel. Juvenile Department v. BlackCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1990
  5. State ex rel. Juvenile Department v. VockrodtCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1997

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API