Legal Opinion

Waite v. Burgess

Nevada Supreme Court

Decided July 3, 1952No. 3707PublishedCited by 19 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

By the Court,

Merrill, J.:

This is a motion to dismiss this appeal for lack of undertaking. The record discloses that after the taking of the appeal by the serving and filing of notice and undertaking (with two individuals serving as sureties), respondent on March 4, 1952 duly served and filed notice of motion for justification of sureties. The following day counsel for appellant appeared before the trial judge and requested that a time be fixed for such justification. The trial judge directed that the matter be brought up on the law and motion calendar. On March 7, 1952 the matter was…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. State Ex Rel. Kostas v. JohnsonIndiana Supreme Court · 1946
  2. Missouri, K. & T. Ry. Co. v. LongSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1926
  3. Schario v. StateOhio Supreme Court · 1922
  4. McCracken v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1890
  5. Crowley Launch & Tugboat Co. v. Suprior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1909

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by19 opinions

  1. Armadillo Bail Bonds v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1991
  2. Briggs v. BrownCalifornia Supreme Court · 2017
  3. Lindauer v. AllenNevada Supreme Court · 1969
  4. Mendoza-Lobos v. StateNevada Supreme Court · 2009
  5. Coate v. OmholtMontana Supreme Court · 1983

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API