Legal Opinion

Bell v. Feibleman & Co.

Louisiana Court of Appeal

Decided December 2, 1935No. 16134PublishedCited by 22 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

JANVIER, Judge.

Plaintiff sustained- injuries as the result of falling over the platform of an automatic weighing machine located near the passageways through which patrons entered the large department store operated in this city by defendant corporation. She charges that it was negligence on the part of defendant to permit the weighing machine to be placed at the spot at which it was located and she avers that the danger which resulted from the location of the said machine was rendered greater by reason of the extraordinarily large crowd which defendant had on that day attracted to its…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Bloomer v. SnellenburgSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1908
  2. Langley v. F. W. Woolworth Co.Supreme Court of Rhode Island · 1925
  3. Lawson v. Shreveport Waterworks Co.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1903
  4. Lord v. Sherer Dry Goods Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1910
  5. Nye v. Louis K. Liggett Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1916

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by22 opinions

  1. Peters v. Great Atlantic & Pacific Tea Co.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 1954
  2. Lawson v. D. H. Holmes Co.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 1941
  3. Powell v. L. Feibleman & Co.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 1939
  4. Bartell v. SerioLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1938
  5. Boucher v. Paramount-Richards TheatresLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1947

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API