Legal Opinion

Howard v. Glaze

Supreme Court of Arkansas

Decided April 20, 1987No. 86-227PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

David Newbern, Justice.

This appeal results from the chancellor’s decision that a deed from Chloe Sheffield to the appellants, Gene and Lillian Howard, should be set aside. The action was brought by the appellees who are the brother of the now-deceased Chloe Sheffield and the administrator of her estate. The appellees contended that Mrs. Sheffield was incompetent at the time she made the deed and that she was subjected to undue influence by the appellants.

The appellants have stated only one point for appeal: The chancellor’s decision was clearly against the preponderance of the evidence. In…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Rose v. DunnSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1984
  2. Faulkner v. FeazelSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1914
  3. Inglish v. BrenemanSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1844
  4. Housing Authority of Little Rock v. PetersSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1968
  5. Perry v. PerrySupreme Court of Arkansas · 1962

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Dent v. WrightSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1995
  2. Margaret Ellis v. Roger Thompson and Frances ThompsonCourt of Appeals of Arkansas · 2019
  3. Dent v. WrightSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1995

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API