United States v. Alberto Orlandez-Gamboa, AKA "Caracol," AKA "Chiriqui,"
Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
CALABRESI, Circuit Judge.
This is an interlocutory appeal from an order of the federal district court for the Southern District of New York (Griesa, J.) declaring inadmissible statements made by Defendant-Appellee Alberto Orlandez-Gamboa to Colombian prosecutors. 1 The signed statements at issue were made by Gamboa in the course of the Colombian equivalent of plea negotiations with respect to Gamboa’s alleged drug trafficking. We are asked whether admission of this evidence is barred by Federal Rule of Evidence 410(4), as the district court held, or, in the alternative by the Fifth Amendment.…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- Brady v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
- Arizona v. FulminanteSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
- Dickerson v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 2000
- Bram v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1897
- Bartkus v. IllinoisSupreme Court of the United States · 1959
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by15 opinions
- John F. Kaminski v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2003
- United States v. EstradaCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2005
- United States v. EstradaCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2005
- Deskovic v. City of PeekskillDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2012
- United States v. HaakCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2018
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.