Legal Opinion

Estate of Stone v. Central Republic Bank & Trust Co.

Wisconsin Supreme Court

Decided May 9, 1933PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtNelson, J.

The claim herein is based upon a written guaranty dated October 7, 1929, signed by Nat Stone and delivered to the National Bank of the Republic of Chicago, Illinois (hereafter called'the “bank”), which guaranty was thereafter assigned to claimant, the Central Republic Bank & Trust Company. At all of the times to be mentioned, DeWolf & Company, Inc. (hereafter called the “company”), was engaged in the business of selling stocks and bonds, both as principal and as broker, and had its account at the bank. It was the practice of the company to deposit with the bank various stocks and bonds,…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Wait v. Homestead Building Ass'nWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1918
  2. Citizens' Bank & Trust Co. v. ThorntonCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1909
  3. Koch v. RothIllinois Supreme Court · 1894
  4. Monson v. MeyerIllinois Supreme Court · 1901
  5. Hansen v. RounsavellIllinois Supreme Court · 1874

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Sorge Ice Cream & Dairy Co. v. WahlgrenWisconsin Supreme Court · 1965
  2. Theiler v. Consolidated Indemnity & Insurance Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1933
  3. Howe v. Scannell (In Re Scannell)United States Bankruptcy Court, W.D. Wisconsin · 1986
  4. Lakeshore Commercial Finance Corp. v. Bradford Arms Corp.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1970
  5. Marshall & Ilsley Bank v. Hackett, Hoff & Thiermann, Inc.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1933

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API