Legal Opinion · Concurrence

Athol Memorial Hospital v. Commissioner of the Division of Medical Assistance

Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court

Decided August 6, 2002Published

1ConcurrenceCordy, J.

(concurring, with whom Marshall, C.J., joins). I agree with the court’s conclusion that the plaintiffs cannot proceed on a breach of contract theory, and that they have forfeited any right to reimbursement at the inpatient rate on any denied claim not administratively appealed to the division’s board of hearings as required by 130 Code Mass. Regs. § 450.211 (1997). I write separately to express my view that the plaintiffs could properly have sought reimbursement at the outpatient rate for all claims denied solely on the ground that the treatment, while medically appropriate, could have been…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. American Federation of Government Employees v. Vernon D. Acree, Commissioner of CustomsCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1973
  2. DiStefano v. Commissioner of RevenueMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1985
  3. Massachusetts Eye & Ear Infirmary v. Commissioner of Division of Medical AssistanceMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1999

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API