Legal Opinion

Ordon v. Karpie

District Court, D. Connecticut

Decided March 26, 2004No. CIV. 3:01cv1951(AHN)PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

RULING ON DISCOVERY MOTIONS

FITZSIMMONS, United States Magistrate Judge.

On February 19, 2004, the court heard oral argument on seven discovery motions pending before the court: defendants’ motions to preclude expert testimony or compel compliance [does. ##53,55,57,59,61]; defendants’ motion to compel [doc. # 63]; and plaintiffs motion to compel [doc. # 69]. After considering the arguments presented at oral argument and in counsel’s memoranda, the court orders the following.

Defendants’ motions to preclude or compel [docs. ## 53,55,57,59,61]

Defendants move to preclude the testimony of five of…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Reed v. BinderDistrict Court, D. New Jersey · 1996
  2. Wreath v. United StatesDistrict Court, D. Kansas · 1995

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Parks v. BlanchetteDistrict Court, D. Connecticut · 2015
  2. National Railroad Passenger Corp. v. Railway Express, LLCDistrict Court, D. Maryland · 2010
  3. Rieger v. Orlor, Inc.District Court, D. Connecticut · 2006
  4. Scott v. City of New YorkDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2008
  5. Kalra v. Adler Pollock & Sheehan P.C.District Court, D. Connecticut · 2020

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API