United States v. Claude Lamott Wilford, Jr.
Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
ROSENN, Circuit Judge.
This appeal raises questions concerning the guidelines formulated by this court in United States v. Barber, 442 F. 2d 517 (3d Cir. 1971), for jury instructions on identification. Appellant, Claude Lamott Wilford, Jr., was tried to a jury and convicted of one count of unlawful distribution of heroin in violation of 21 U.S.C. § 841(a)(1). He was sentenced to a term of eight years plus a special parole term of three years. On appeal, he contends that the failure of the trial judge to specifically instruct the jury on eyewitness identification constitutes…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- United States v. WadeSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- United States v. Melvin TelfaireCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1972
- Clifton Gregory v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1966
- United States v. BarberCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1971
- United States of America Ex Rel. Cleveland Reed v. Raymond Anderson, Warden, Delaware Correctional CenterCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1972
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- United States v. AlexanderCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1995
- United States v. Thomas Michael KavanaghCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1978
- Smith v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1975
- Ostalaza v. PeopleSupreme Court of The Virgin Islands · 2013
- Bass v. ClarkDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2018
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.