La Grande Laundry Co. v. Pillsbury
California Supreme Court
APPLICATION for a Writ of Certiorari to review an award of the Industrial Accident Commission of the State of California. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.
1Opinion of the CourtMelvin, J.
A writ of certiorari was issued for the purpose of reviewing the action of the Industrial Accident Commission in awarding to Mary E. English compensation from La Grande Laundry Company (a corporation), because of the death of her husband.
There is very slight conflict with reference to the facts. It appears from the testimony taken before the Industrial Accident Commission that Charles P. Cain was the president and manager of La Grande Laundry Company, and he and his wife were stockholders. There was no formal proof of the sort of business in which the corporation was engaged, but the name…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- Maryland Casualty Co. v. PillsburyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1916
3Cited by14 opinions
- Callihan v. MontgomerySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1922
- Oilmen's Reciprocal Ass'n v. GillelandTexas Commission of Appeals · 1927
- State ex rel. Lennon v. District CourtSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1917
- Roman Catholic Archbishop v. Industrial Accident CommissionCalifornia Supreme Court · 1924
- Dancy v. Abraham Bros. Packing Co.Tennessee Supreme Court · 1937
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.