Legal Opinion

Replogle v. Seattle School District No. 1

Washington Supreme Court

Decided March 31, 1915No. 11927PublishedCited by 8 opinions

Appeal from a judgment of the superior court for King county, Mackintosh, J., entered September 10, 1913, upon the verdict of a jury rendered in favor of the plaintiff, in an action for personal injuries sustained by an employee assisting in installing an electric motor.

1Opinion of the CourtCrow, J.

Action by Irl T. Replogle against Seattle School District No. 1, for damages for personal injuries, and for services rendered. From a judgment in plaintiff’s favor, the defendant has appealed.

There are two causes of action. Appellant concedes, however, that respondent is entitled to recover $43.20, the amount claimed on the second cause of action for services rendered, and it need not be further considered.

The question involved on this appeal affects the first cause of action only. The complaint, in substance, alleges, that *582appellant is a duly organized school district; that on December 27,…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Peet v. MillsWashington Supreme Court · 1913
  2. Acres v. Frederick & Nelson, Inc.Washington Supreme Court · 1914

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Ex Parte Majestic Coal Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1922
  2. Edwards v. Dept. of Labor and IndustriesWashington Supreme Court · 1928
  3. Denny v. Department of Labor & IndustriesWashington Supreme Court · 1933
  4. Godefroy v. ReillyWashington Supreme Court · 1928
  5. Parker v. Pantages Theater Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1927

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API