Cohee v. State
Indiana Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
NAJAM, Judge.
STATEMENT OF THE CASE
Michael E. Cohee brings this interlocutory appeal from the trial court’s denial of his motion to suppress evidence. Cohee raises a single issue for our review, which we restate as follows: whether he was entitled to be read his Miranda rights or to exercise his right to counsel before he submitted to a chemical test pursuant to Indiana Code Section 9-30-6-2(a). We affirm.
FACTS AND PROCEDURAL HISTORY
On April 10, 2010, Richmond Police Department Officer Ami Miller initiated a traffic stop of Cohee’s vehicle due to a broken light over his license plate.…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- Schmerber v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- Boyd v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1886
- Holt v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1910
- Pirtle v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1975
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Ashley Reid v. State of IndianaIndiana Court of Appeals · 2018