United States v. Andrews

GLADIS, Senior Judge:

Among other things, the accused contends that the military offenses of which he was convicted must be dismissed because the court-martial lacked jurisdiction by reason of recruiter misconduct in procuring his enlistment. See United States v. Marsh, 15 M.J. 252 (C.M.A.1983). We disagree and affirm because defects such as those in the accused’s enlistment, which were concealed *718by reason of recruiter misconduct, were waivable at the time he enlisted or became waivable by virtue of a change to recruiting regulations made before the offenses were committed.

Pursuant to his…