Cochran v. Wyer
New York Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtDaly, J.
Plaintiff moves to strike out the first separate defense for legal insufficiency. Said defense reads: u On information and belief, that the complaint herein fails to state a cause of action.”
In opposition to this motion, defendant argues that rule 109 of the Rules of Civil Practice authorizes the striking out of a defense for insufficiency only where the defense “ consisting of new matter is insufficient in law.” He points out that the defense under attack does not consist of new matter, but is a conclusion of law.
So far from being an argument against this motion, the above statement…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Kalmanash v. SmithNew York Court of Appeals · 1943
- Hendrix v. Manhattan Beach Development Co. & MarshallAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1917
- New Amsterdam Casualty Co. v. National Union Fire InsuranceAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1932
- McGovern v. WeisAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1943
- Fairchild v. LeoAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1912
3Cited by2 opinions
- D'Auria v. NiemiecNew York Supreme Court · 1959
- W. J. Gaskell, Inc. v. GaskellNew York Supreme Court · 1957