Legal Opinion

Cochran v. Wyer

New York Supreme Court

Decided November 7, 1952PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtDaly, J.

Plaintiff moves to strike out the first separate defense for legal insufficiency. Said defense reads: u On information and belief, that the complaint herein fails to state a cause of action.”

In opposition to this motion, defendant argues that rule 109 of the Rules of Civil Practice authorizes the striking out of a defense for insufficiency only where the defense “ consisting of new matter is insufficient in law.” He points out that the defense under attack does not consist of new matter, but is a conclusion of law.

So far from being an argument against this motion, the above statement…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Kalmanash v. SmithNew York Court of Appeals · 1943
  2. Hendrix v. Manhattan Beach Development Co. & MarshallAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1917
  3. New Amsterdam Casualty Co. v. National Union Fire InsuranceAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1932
  4. McGovern v. WeisAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1943
  5. Fairchild v. LeoAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1912

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. D'Auria v. NiemiecNew York Supreme Court · 1959
  2. W. J. Gaskell, Inc. v. GaskellNew York Supreme Court · 1957

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API