Legal Opinion

Territory of Hawaii v. Ah Sing

Hawaii Supreme Court

Decided September 16, 1907PublishedCited by 3 opinions

EeeoR to Circuit Court, First Circuit.

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OP THE COURT BY

BALLOU, J.

Ah Sing and sixty-seven others were found guilty in the district court of Honolulu, and afterwards upon appeal in the circuit court of the first circuit, of violating R. L., Sec. 3175, by being present at a place where a gambling game was being carried on. The complaint in the district court, the transcript of the record in that court, the notice of appeal, the district magistrate’s certificate of appeal and the decision of the circuit judge who tried the case, jury waived, all set out in full the names of the sixty-eight defendants. The other papers in the…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Cox and Dick v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1832
  2. Todd v. DanielSupreme Court of the United States · 1842
  3. Simpson v. GreeleySupreme Court of the United States · 1874
  4. Deneale and Others v. STUMP'S EXECUTORS.Supreme Court of the United States · 1834
  5. Feibelman v. PackardSupreme Court of the United States · 1882

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Kealoha v. Halawa Plantation, Ltd.Hawaii Supreme Court · 1918
  2. Robinson v. KaaeHawaii Supreme Court · 1915
  3. Mid-Pacific Dress Manufacturing Co. v. CadinhaHawaii Supreme Court · 1934

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API