In Re the Marriage of Conrad

Husband appeals the trial court’s denial of his motion to reopen the parties’ dissolution case. He argues that wife committed intrinsic fraud by falsely representing during the dissolution trial that she did not own certain property and that the trial court erred in concluding that ORS 107.452, the statutory foundation for husband’s motion, does not provide relief for that type of fraud. We reverse and remand.

The parties’ marriage was dissolved by a judgment entered in October 1999. In August 2001, husband filed a motion to reopen the case. In an affidavit supporting the motion, husband…