Z & R Cab, LLC v. Philadelphia Parking Authority
District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
*511 MEMORANDUM
DALZELL, District Judge.
I. Introduction
Plaintiff taxicab companies move for reconsideration of our June 4, 2014 Order (the “June Order”) dismissing their complaint because the remedy they seek is beyond the power of a federal court to decide. For the reasons articulated below, we will deny their motion.
Z & R Cab, LLC and Zoro, Inc. (collectively “Z & R”) originally brought suit to recover fees paid to the Philadelphia Parking Authority (“PPA”) under a state statute Pennsylvania’s Commonwealth Court held unconstitutional in February of 2013. In our June Order we denied the PPA’s…
2Cases cited26 opinions
- Younger v. HarrisSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- Colorado River Water Conservation District v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Railroad Comm'n of Tex. v. Pullman Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1941
- Michigan v. LongSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Quackenbush v. Allstate InsuranceSupreme Court of the United States · 1996
21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Chervon (HK) Limited v. One World Technologies, Inc.District Court, D. Delaware · 2025