Pierce v. Union County
Oregon Supreme Court
Prom Union: Kobert Eakin, Judge. Proceedings by Union County for the laying out of a highway. Prom a judgment of the circuit court dismissing an appeal from the county court by Walter M. Pierce, a claimant for damages, he appeals.
1Opinion of the CourtJustice Moore
This is a claim for damages which the plaintiff, Walter M. Pierce, alleges he will sustain if the county court of Union County opens a county road across his premises. The facts involved herein are almost identical with the details stated in the case of Miller v. Union County, 48 Or. 266 (86 Pac. 3), except that in the case at bar the board of county road viewers found-that Pierce would sustain no damages by the opening of the proposed, road. The county court on October 8, 1905, approved this report as to the damages, but continued the matter as to establishing the road until January 5, 1906,…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- Miller v. Union CountyOregon Supreme Court · 1906