Miller v. Union County
Oregon Supreme Court
From Union: Robert Eakin, Judge. Statement by Mr.- Justice Moore. This is a claim for damages which it is asserted the owner of. certain real property will sustain if a public road is established across his premises.
Read the full summary
From Union: Robert Eakin, Judge. Statement by Mr.- Justice Moore. This is a claim for damages which it is asserted the owner of. certain real property will sustain if a public road is established across his premises. Dillie Randall and others petitioned the county court of Union County to lay out a county road therein, and, having complied with all the jurisdictional requirements, the board of county road viewers were ordered to meet at a time and place specified, and view, survey and lay out a road on the line designated. This order was obeyed, and the board on August 2, 1905, filed their…
1Opinion of the CourtJustice Moore
The question to be considered is whether or not the order of the county court of September 8, 1905, approving the report of the board of county road viewers as to plaintiff’s claim for damages was a final judgment. The statute prescribing the method of establishing county roads provides, in effect, that it shall be the duty of the county court, on receiving the report of the board of county road viewers, to cause the same to be read publicly on two different days of the same term, and if no petition for damages be filed, and the court is satisfied that such road will be of public utility, the…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Fanning v. GillilandOregon Supreme Court · 1900
- McCall v. Marion CountyOregon Supreme Court · 1903
- City of Dallas v. BeemanCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1898
- Kerns v. LeeOregon Supreme Court · 1904
- Leader v. Multnomah CountyOregon Supreme Court · 1892
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- In Re Complaints and Appeals of Erie Railroad SystemSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1955
- Pierce v. Union CountyOregon Supreme Court · 1906