Legal Opinion
Kaliski v. Gossett
Court of Appeals of Texas
Decided September 8, 1937No. 10099PublishedCited by 13 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MURRAY, Justice.
Appellee, Zeta Gossett, acting in his official capacity as Banking Commissioner of Texas, instituted this suit' against Dr. S. R. Kaliski, seeking to recover an alleged hank stockholder’s assessmerit. The trial was to the court without the intervention of a jury, and resulted in judgment in favor of the Banking Commissioner in the sum of $4,000.
From this judgment Dr. Kaliski has prosecuted this appeal.
The facts are as follows: The Peoples Finance Company of San Antonio was incorporated on the 24th day of September, 1924, under and by virtue of the' provisions of subdivision 29…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Coombes v. GetzSupreme Court of the United States · 1932
- Gamble v. DanielCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1930
- In Re Prudence Co.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1935
- In Re Bay Cities Guaranty Building-Loan Ass'nDistrict Court, S.D. California · 1931
3Cited by13 opinions
- Brenham Production Credit Ass'n v. ZeissTexas Supreme Court · 1953
- Central Mortgage & Trust, Inc. v. State (In Re Central Mortgage & Trust, Inc.)District Court, S.D. Texas · 1985
- Federal Deposit Insurance Corp. of Washington v. EnstenessSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1942
- Steiner v. Community Finance & Thrift Corp.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1953
- Texas Bankers Ass'n v. Government Employees Credit UnionCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1981
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.