Legal Opinion

Polishuk v. Beavin

Tennessee Supreme Court

Decided February 26, 1969PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Chattin

This action was originally brought in the Circuit Court of Anderson County by Rudy C. Beavin against Paul Polishuk for personal injuries sustained while riding as a guest in an automobile owned and operated by Poli-shuk. Both parties were employees of the Federal Government.

Defendant removed the suit to the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Tennessee, Northern Division, insisting plaintiff’s exclusive remedy was against the United States under the Federal Tort Claims Act, 28 U.S.C.A., Section 2679(b), defendant being a Federal employee and operating his automobile in…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Feres v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1950
  2. George G. Allman v. W. H. HanleyCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1962
  3. Sammy J. Vantrease v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1968
  4. Cunningham v. Union Chevrolet Co.Tennessee Supreme Court · 1941
  5. Marion v. United StatesDistrict Court, D. Maryland · 1963

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Fiocca v. KirschnerAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2002

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API