Legal Opinion

John H. Chambers v. Colorado Department of Corrections Margaret Heil, in Her Individual and Official Capacity

Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit

Decided March 7, 2000No. 97-1023PublishedCited by 59 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION ON REMAND

JOHN C. PORFILIO, Senior Circuit Judge.

The questions presented here are whether the Colorado Department of Corrections’ Sex Offender Component classifying John H. Chambers a sex offender and requiring his participation in the Sexual Offender .Treatment Program (SOTP) violates the Ex Post Facto Clause and implicates a liberty interest under the Due Process Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment. We affirm, in part, and reverse, in part.

Mr. Chambers, an inmate in the custody of the Colorado Department of Corrections (CDOC), began serving a thirty-nine year sentence for aggravated…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Wolff v. McDonnellSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
  2. Sandin v. ConnerSupreme Court of the United States · 1995
  3. Meachum v. FanoSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  4. Kentucky Department of Corrections v. ThompsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
  5. Kansas v. HendricksSupreme Court of the United States · 1997

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by59 opinions

  1. Renchenski v. WilliamsCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2010
  2. Newman v. BeardCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2010
  3. Gwinn v. AwmillerCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2004
  4. Yassin Aref v. Loretta LynchCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2016
  5. Vega v. LantzCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2010

54 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API