Cincinnati Traction Co. v. Public Utilities Commission
Ohio Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtAllen, J.
The plaintiff in error claims: First that the action of the Pliblio Utilities Commission in overruling the objection and complaint was arbitrary, unreasonable and unlawful; second, that the interpretation placed by the Commission upon Section 614-87, General Code, is unwarranted by the Act; third, that that part of Section 614-87, General Code, requiring the Commission to issue a certificate to bus operators who were in good faith operating on the day of filing the act with the secretary of state is unconstitutional.
We shall first consider the objection that the interpretation placed by the…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- Royal Green Coach Co. v. Public Utilities CommissionOhio Supreme Court · 1924
3Cited by2 opinions
- Cincinnati Traction Co. v. Public Utilities CommissionOhio Supreme Court · 1925
- Eager v. Pub. Util. Comm.Ohio Supreme Court · 1925