Legal Opinion

Eager v. Pub. Util. Comm.

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided August 12, 1925No. 19319Published

1Opinion of the Court

Frank Eager applied to the Public Utilities Commission for a certificate of public convenience and necessity to permit him to operate a bus line between Waterloo, Indiana, and Bryan, Ohio. On hearing of the application, the Commission refused to grant the permit in spite of the fact that said permit has not been protested by the only transportation company which could have even a slight interest in the outcome of the matter.

Bryan is situated in the northwestern part of Ohio, near to Indiana’s boundary. Waterloo is a few miles past the boundary in Indiana. It is claimed in the Supreme Court…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Cincinnati Traction Co. v. Public Utilities CommissionOhio Supreme Court · 1924

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API