Legal Opinion
Pisciotta v. Teledyne Industries, Inc.
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided August 5, 1996No. 94-55862, CV-93-14-JNKPublishedCited by 23 opinions
1Per curiam
Appellants seek review of the district court’s orders dismissing Appellants’ seventh and eighth causes of action, granting summary judgment in favor of Teledyne Industries, Inc. And Teledyne, Inc. (“Teledyne”) and denying Appellants’ motion to amend their complaint to add a claim based on promissory estoppel. We have jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1291 and affirm the district court’s orders.
FACTUAL AND PROCEDURAL BACKGROUND
Appellants are approximately 400 present and former salaried employees of Appellee, Teledyne Industries, Inc. Appellants contend that Teledyne violated ERISA when it…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Shaw v. Delta Air Lines, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Fort Halifax Packing Co. v. CoyneSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
- Curtiss-Wright Corp. v. SchoonejongenSupreme Court of the United States · 1995
- Regina (Rega) Jablon v. Dean Witter & Co., and Sydney TurnerCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1980
- Fu-Kong Tzung Jean Tzung v. State Farm Fire and Casualty Company, and Does 1 Through 100, InclusiveCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1989
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by23 opinions
- Steckman v. Hart Brewing, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1998
- Heard v. SheahanCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2001
- Serpa v. SBC Telecommunications, Inc.District Court, N.D. California · 2004
- Miele v. Pension Plan of New York State Teamsters Conference Pension & Retirement FundDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 1999
- Riley v. Metropolitan Life InsuranceCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2014
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.