Legal Opinion

In re the Arbitration between Utica Mutual Insurance Company

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided November 15, 1995PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

—Order and judgment reversed on the law with costs and petition dismissed. Memorandum: Supreme Court should have denied petitioner’s application to stay the arbitration of respondent’s claim for underinsured benefits.

*904On July 30, 1988, respondent was seriously injured when his car was struck from the rear by a vehicle that was not covered by a liability insurance policy. At the time of the accident, respondent had a policy of insurance with petitioner that provided both uninsured and underinsured motorist coverage. In November 1993 petitioner paid respondent the uninsured motorist benefits…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Miller v. Continental InsuranceNew York Court of Appeals · 1976
  2. Fireman's Fund Insurance v. FredaAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1989
  3. United Community Insurance v. MucatelNew York Court of Appeals · 1987
  4. United Community Insurance v. MucatelNew York Supreme Court · 1985
  5. Reichel v. Government Employees InsuranceNew York Court of Appeals · 1985

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Raffellini v. State Farm Mutual Automobile InsuranceAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2006

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API