Legal Opinion
Lampert v. Mikos
New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division
Decided October 21, 1952PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
22 N.J. Super. 155 (1952)
91 A.2d 577
IRVING LAMPERT, DAVID LAMPERT, SAMUEL LAMPERT AND IRVING LAMPERT, ADMINISTRATOR C.T.A. OF THE ESTATE OF JOSEPH LAMPERT, DECEASED, PLAINTIFFS-APPELLANTS,
v.
LANISLAUS MIKOS AND ELIZABETH MIKOS, DEFENDANTS-RESPONDENTS.
Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division.
Argued October 6, 1952.
Decided October 21, 1952.
Before Judges JAYNE, PROCTOR and SCHETTINO.
Mr. Lewis Winetsky argued the cause for appellants (Mr. Harry Mopsick, attorney).
Mr. Maurice C. Brigadier argued the cause for respondents (Mr. Seymour S. Lichtenstein, attorney).
The opinion of the court was…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Turon v. J. & L. CONSTRUCTION CO.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1952
- Peter W. Kero, Inc. v. Terminal Construction Corp.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1951
- Malinauskas v. Public Service Interstate Transportation Co.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1951
- Rapp v. PUBLIC SERVICE COORDINATED TRANSPORT, ETC.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1952
- Dewar v. RuehleSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1948
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Bree v. JalbertNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1965
- Skupienski v. MalyNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1957