Legal Opinion

Foster v. International Brotherhood of Teamsters, Chauffeurs

Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Washington County

Decided November 7, 1942No. 189PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

Per Curiam,

This case comes before us on the appeal of S. A. Foster, one of the respondents, from a decision of the Pennsylvania Labor Relations Board. At the argument, S. A. Foster was *592represented by counsel; Local Union No. 585, International Brotherhood of Teamsters, Chauffeurs, Stablemen and Helpers of America, the complainant, was not represented; the Pennsylvania Labor Relations Board was represented by its counsel and filed its petition for enforcement of its order. These proceedings are statutory and are comparatively new in Pennsylvania, the Pennsylvania Labor Relations Board having…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Pennsylvania Labor Relations Board v. Heinel Motors, Inc.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1942

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Minnesota Water Resources Board v. County of TraverseSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1970

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API