Legal Opinion

Crucible Inc. v. United States

United States Court of Claims

Decided January 24, 1979No. 336-77PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Per curiam

The principal issue in this case, here on cross-motions for summary judgment, is whether in its federal income tax returns the plaintiff properly deducted in the year of accrual amounts accrued under its 1962 *126Supplemental Unemployment Benefits ("SUB”) Plan. For the reasons explained below, we grant in part and deny in part each motion for summary judgment, and remand the case to the Trial Division for proceedings in accordance with this opinion.

I

Crucible Steel Company ("Crucible Steel”), an accrual-basis taxpayer to which the plaintiff is the successor in interest,1 was a steel manufacturer.…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Aparacor, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1978
  2. Lukens Steel Company v. Commissioner of Internal RevenueCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1971
  3. Latrobe Steel Co. v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 1974
  4. Cyclops Corp. v. United StatesDistrict Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · 1976
  5. Inland Steel Co.United States Court of Claims · 1978

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Rust Communications Group, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1990
  2. Anderson v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1990
  3. Sartin v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1984
  4. Supermarkets General Corp. v. United StatesDistrict Court, D. New Jersey · 1982
  5. General Steel Industries, Inc.United States Court of Claims · 1979

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API