McIver Abstract Co. v. Slaton
Supreme Court of Arkansas
1Opinion of the Court
Kirby, J.,
(after stating the facts). It is insisted that the court erred in holding act 346 of 1925 invalid, and this contention must ¡be sustained.
The land was sold for taxes, under order of the court, on the 20th day of 'September, 1924, and purchased by the district, and, under the law existing at the time, subject to redemption within two years. Not being redeemed, the commissioner, on October 25, 1926, conveyed it by deed to Road Improvement District No: 7.
Said act 346 of the Acts of 1925 became effective on the 10th day of June, 1925,'before the two years allowed by the existing law for…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- Walker v. FergusonSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1928
3Cited by3 opinions
- Anglo California National Bank of San Francisco v. LelandCalifornia Supreme Court · 1937
- Grieb, County Clerk v. Natl. Bank of Ky.'s Rec.Court of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1933
- Baur v. GwaltneySupreme Court of Arkansas · 1935