Shoemaker v. City of York
Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion by
Judge DiSalle,
On April 28, 1978, the City of York (City) commensed an assumpsit action, by way of a praecipe for writ of summons, against the law firm of Shoemaker, Thompson & Ness (Taxpayer) to collect payment of the City’s Business Privilege Tax (Tax). The same day, the City obtained a subpoena to compel Taxpayer to produce books and records revealing its gross receipts. On May 3, 1978, Taxpayer filed a motion for a protective order. The lower court temporarily restrained production of the records, and ordered that a rule be issued upon the City to show cause why the protective…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Cohen v. Beneficial Industrial Loan Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1949
- Pugar v. GrecoSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1978
- Bell v. Beneficial Consumer Discount Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1975
- Pennsylvania Human Relations Commission v. Jones & Laughlin Steel Corp.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1978
3Cited by1 opinion
- Radell v. Pennsylvania Public Utility CommissionCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1983