Legal Opinion

Polk Co. v. Glover

District Court, S.D. Florida

Decided February 1, 1938PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

LONG, District Judge.

This case is before the court upon the bill of complaint, motions to dismiss, and answers. The attack is made on chapter 17783, Laws of Florida, Acts 1937: “An Act Relating to and Regulating the Marking and Labelling of Containers of Canned Citrus Fruit and/or Citrus Juice; Requiring That the Label on Such Containers Show in What State or Country the Citrus Fruit or Citrus Juice in Such Containers Was Produced or Grown and Requiring That Any Container of Canned Citrus Fruit or Citrus Juice Produced or Grown in the State of Florida Shall Have the Word ‘Florida’ Stamped…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. United States v. GrimaudSupreme Court of the United States · 1911
  2. Coe v. ErrolSupreme Court of the United States · 1886
  3. Hammer v. DagenhartSupreme Court of the United States · 1918
  4. Pacific States Box & Basket Co. v. WhiteSupreme Court of the United States · 1935
  5. Sligh v. KirkwoodSupreme Court of the United States · 1915

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Polk Co. v. GloverSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
  2. Snively Groves, Inc. v. Florida Citrus CommissionDistrict Court, N.D. Florida · 1938
  3. Chicago Mercantile Exchange v. TiekenDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 1959
  4. Polk Co. v. GloverSupreme Court of the United States · 1938

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API