McCredy v. Thrush
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Motion by the defendant, Henry Thrush, for a new trial upon a case containing exceptions, ordered to he heard at the Appellate Division in the first instance, upon the verdict of a jury in favor of the plaintiff, rendered by direction of the court.
1Opinion of the Court
Ingraham, J.:
This action was brought to recover the amount of the loss sustained by the plaintiff under a policy of insurance whereby certain underwriters, represented by and acting through Daniel Woodcock, as attorney in fact, agreed to insure the plaintiff’s assignor against all loss or damage by fire to certain specifically described property, to an amount not exceeding $2,000. This policy contained the fol*467lowing provision : “ Ho action shall be brought to enforce the provisions of this policy except against the general manager, as attorney in fact, and representing all of the…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Secor v. . SturgisNew York Court of Appeals · 1858
- Perry v. . DickersonNew York Court of Appeals · 1881
- Leiter v. BeecherAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1896
- Samuel v. Fidelity & Casualty Co.New York Supreme Court · 1894
- Compton v. BeecherAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1897
3Cited by4 opinions
- H. D. I. Diamonds, Inc. v. Frederick Modell, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1982
- Fluegelman v. ArmstrongAppellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York · 1908
- McCredy v. WoodcockAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1899
- Valtech Research, Inc. v. Meridian Abstract Corp.Civil Court of the City of New York · 2009