Legal Opinion

Fryshman v. United States Commission for the Preservation of America's

District Court, District of Columbia

Decided October 22, 2019No. Civil Action No. 2018-2632Published

1Opinion of the Court

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA _________________________________________ ) BERNARD FRYSHMAN, PhD et al., ) ) Plaintiffs, ) ) v. ) Case No. 18-cv-02632 (APM) ) UNITED STATES COMMISSION FOR THE ) PRESERVATION OF AMERICA’S ) HERITAGE ABROAD ) ) Defendant. ) _________________________________________ ) MEMORANDUM OPINION I. INTRODUCTION Plaintiffs in this case, Dr. Bernard Fryshman and Mr. Boruch Pines, seek to compel the United States Commission for the Preservation of America’s Heritage Abroad (“Commission”) to prevent the Lithuanian government from building a…

2Cases cited27 opinions

  1. Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
  2. Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
  3. Lujan v. Defenders of WildlifeSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
  4. Warth v. SeldinSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
  5. Allen v. WrightSupreme Court of the United States · 1984

22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API