Legal Opinion
United States v. Annette Gonzalez-Acosta
Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit
Decided March 22, 1993No. 92-2146PublishedCited by 32 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
JOHN P. MOORE, Circuit Judge.
After examining the briefs and appellate record, this panel has determined unanimously that oral argument would not materially assist the determination of this appeal. See Fed.R.App.P. 34(a); 10th Cir.R. 34.1.9. The cause is therefore ordered submitted without oral argument.
Defendant Annette Gonzalez-Acosta appeals her conviction for possession with intent to distribute marijuana. She raises three questions for our review: (a) whether the district court erred in denying her motion to suppress; (b) whether the court erred in denying her motion for pretrial…
2Cases cited27 opinions
- Katz v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- Adams v. WilliamsSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- United States v. NixonSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
- Texas v. BrownSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Horton v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1990
22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by32 opinions
- United States v. JamesCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2001
- United States v. Cruz-MendezCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2006
- United States v. Abdush-ShakurCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2006
- United States v. Juan Manuel Rascon-Ortiz, and Edgar Rascon-SoteloCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1993
- United States v. BroomfieldCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2000
27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.