Legal Opinion

Commonwealth ex rel. Ross v. Maroney

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided November 24, 1964No. Appeal, No. 282PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Mr. Chief Justice Bell,

This is an appeal from an Order denying a petition by relator for a writ of habeas corpus which attacked the validity of the judgment and sentence imposed upon him.

A jury trying relator for the killing of Mrs. Boston returned a verdict of guilty of murder in the first degree with sentence of death. After denial of his motion for a new trial, relator appealed the judgment to this Court. The facts and the applicable law were carefully and very thoroughly reviewed in Common*88wealth, v. Ross, 413 Pa. 35, 195 A. 2d 81. Tlie facts may be briefly summarized as follows:

T…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Lisenba v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1942
  2. Commonwealth v. RossSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1963
  3. United States Ex Rel. Elmer Burke, Relator-Appellant v. Wilfred L. Denno, Warden of Sing Sing PrisonCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1957
  4. United States ex rel. Burke v. DennoDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1957

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Headman v. BERMAN LEASING COMPANYDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1972
  2. Bernard Ross v. James F. Maroney, Superintendent of the Correctional Institution at PittsburghCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1967
  3. Bernard Ross v. James F. Maroney, Superintendent of the Correctional Institution at PittsburghCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1967

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API