Legal Opinion

Headman v. BERMAN LEASING COMPANY

District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania

Decided November 10, 1972No. Civ. A. 70-2887PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM AND ORDER

TROUTMAN, District Judge.

This cause of action arises out of a motor vehicle collision occurring on May 27, 1969. Plaintiffs filed suit in this Court against defendant, Berman Leasing Company, alleging that the truck driver was the agent, servant and employee of defendant, acting within the course and scope of his employment under its direct supervision and control. In its answer, defendant denied agency, and, at this time, it is apparently undisputed that the driver was not the employee of the defendant, but of Tenneco Chemicals, Inc., the lessee of the truck. Although the…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Nesbitt v. Erie Coach Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1964
  2. Northwest'n Nat. Bk. v. Com'nw'lth.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1942
  3. Conrad's EstateSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1938
  4. Ham v. GougeSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1969
  5. SABINO v. JunioSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1971

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Amusement Industry, Inc. v. SternDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2010
  2. White v. SmithDistrict Court, D. New Jersey · 1975
  3. Home for Crippled Children v. Prudential InsuranceDistrict Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · 1984

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API