Legal Opinion

Holden v. Dunn

Illinois Supreme Court

Decided January 19, 1893PublishedCited by 2 opinions

Writ of Error to the Superior Court of Cook county; the Hon. Kirk Hawes, Judge, presiding.

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Scholfield

The first question, and, in our opinion, the controlling one upon this record, is whether the mortgaged property, upon the death of Dunn, after decree of sale, but before sale made pursuant thereto, descended as real estate to his widow and heirs at law.

The doctrine of equitable conversion as recognized in Baker v. Copenbarger, 15 Ill. 104; Rankin v. Rankin, 36 id. 299; Jennings v. Smith, 29 id. 121; Haward v. Peavey, 128 id. 435, and Matter of Corrington, 124 id. 367, cited by counsel on behalf of plaintiff in error, can, manifestly, have no application to this question, for the reason that…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. King v. CushmanIllinois Supreme Court · 1866
  2. Finley v. ThayerIllinois Supreme Court · 1866

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Baker v. MurphreySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1959
  2. Virgin v. VirginAppellate Court of Illinois · 1900

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API