Legal Opinion
Schultz v. Talley
District Court, W.D. Missouri
Decided November 16, 1993No. 90-0084-CV-W-8PublishedCited by 9 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER
STEVENS, Chief Judge.
Before the Court are plaintiffs motions to quash protective order and cite Shelly Gas-per in contempt. In addition to these issues the court must address the briefing schedule for defendants’ motion to reconsider or amend.
*183I. FACTS
The present case is not the only action brought against Brown Mackie College arising out of its court reporting program. Other aggrieved students and, for a time, some of these plaintiffs also sought relief through the Kansas Attorney General’s office, which conducted an investigation of Brown Mackie. The dispute at the heart of the instant…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Federal Trade Commission v. Grolier Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1983
- In Re MurphyCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1977
- In Re Subpoenas Duces Tecum. Fulbright & Jaworski, Vinson & Elkins, Tesoro Petroleum CorporationCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1984
- In Re Chrysler Motors Corporation Overnight Evaluation Program Litigation. Petition of Chrysler Motors CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1989
- Doubleday v. RuhDistrict Court, E.D. California · 1993
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Evans v. City of ChicagoDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 2005
- Securities & Exchange Commission v. GoldstoneDistrict Court, D. New Mexico · 2014
- Stamps v. Town of FraminghamDistrict Court, D. Massachusetts · 2014
- State ex rel. Missouri Ethics Commission v. NicholsMissouri Court of Appeals · 1998
- Wong v. ThomasDistrict Court, D. New Jersey · 2007
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.