Legal Opinion
In Re Subpoenas Duces Tecum. Fulbright & Jaworski, Vinson & Elkins, Tesoro Petroleum Corporation
Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
Decided July 10, 1984No. 83-2116PublishedCited by 103 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion for the Court filed by Circuit Judge DAVIS.
DAVIS, Circuit Judge:
Appellants challenge orders of the District Court, 1 99 F.R.D. 582, granting appellees’ motion to compel compliance with four subpoenas duces tecum on the grounds that the attorney-client and work product privileges had been waived by prior disclosure. We affirm.
I
Appellees, movants below, are seeking copies of documents which have been furnished by appellants, respondents below, to the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC or Commission) and to a grand jury. The demand for those documents arose out of complaints filed…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Hickman v. TaylorSupreme Court of the United States · 1947
- Upjohn Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
- In Re Sealed CaseCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1982
- United States v. American Telephone & Telegraph Co.Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1980
- Diversified Industries, Inc. v. The Honorable James H. Meredith, Chief Judge of the United States District Court for the Eastern District of MissouriCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1978
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by103 opinions
- Bowne of New York City, Inc. v. AmBase Corp.District Court, S.D. New York · 1993
- United States v. Deloitte LLPCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2010
- In Re Martin Marietta Corporation, United States of America v. William C. PollardCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1988
- United States v. William H. White, Sr., United States of America v. Lester H. Finotti, Jr.Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1989
- United States v. Massachusetts Institute of TechnologyCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1997
98 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.