Legal Opinion
Ruotolo v. Sherwin-Williams Co.
District Court, D. Connecticut
Decided September 26, 1985No. Civ. H-84-605(JAC)PublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
RULING ON PLAINTIFF’S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT AND ON DEFENDANT’S CROSS-MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT
JOSÉ A. CABRANES, District Judge:
The questions presented on these cross-motions for summary judgment are the sufficiency of the summary description of an employee benefit plan established pursuant to the Employee Retirement Income Security Act, 29 U.S.C. § 1001 et seq. (“ERISA”) and the availability of relief to an employee who received a summary plan description that fails to satisfy the statutory standards.
The plaintiff, Steven M. Ruotolo, is a former traveling salesman for the defendant,…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- United States v. Diebold, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1962
- Annette Heyman v. Commerce and Industry Insurance CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1975
- American International Group, Inc. v. London American International Corporation Limited and Midland Bank LimitedCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1981
- Phoenix Savings and Loan, Inc. v. The Aetna Casualty and Surety CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1967
- Morse v. StanleyCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1984
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Moriarity v. United Technologies Corp. Represented Employees Retirement PlanDistrict Court, D. Connecticut · 1996
- Kaiser Permanente Employees Pension Plan v. BertozziDistrict Court, N.D. California · 1994
- Desmarais v. Joy Manufacturing Co.Supreme Court of New Hampshire · 1988
- Adams v. JC Penney Co., Inc.District Court, D. Oregon · 1994
- Moyle v. Liberty Mutual Retirement Benefit PlanDistrict Court, S.D. California · 2013
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.